This review critically examines claims surrounding cognitive-training and brain games, highlighting mixed evidence for their effectiveness. While users often improve at the specific games they practice, evidence of broader cognitive benefits that transfer to real-world skills remains inconsistent. Studies suggest that structured activities like exercise, learning new skills, or volunteering may offer similar or greater cognitive benefits without relying on brain-training programs. The research emphasizes the need for more rigorous methodologies and real-world impact evaluations.
Prioritize diverse and engaging cognitive activities such as learning a new instrument, physical-exercise, or volunteering instead of solely relying on brain-training games. These activities offer broader and more proven benefits. Use brain games cautiously as a supplementary tool, noting their limited real-world transfer potential based on current evidence.